D.g. Certifiers

KCTD  Newbie   1 review

FANTASTIC professional service. Wouldn't go anywhere else! Highly Recommended. :)

meredithe  Newbie   1 review

I would like to disagree completely with the last comment posted!! I am not affiliated with dg certifiers in anyway, just a happy customer. Darryl went out of his was to provide information regarding the certification process, which I followed promptly and had no problems getting approvals granted. Darryl is in my opinion extremely professional when it comes to safety. Sure if you want a cowboy to certify your structure don't use DG certifiers.

DGcertRbad  Newbie   1 review

DO NOT USE DG CERTIFIERS if you want worry free building certification.

We had to pay them in cash for the initial visit then once they looked at what had to be certified they charged us upfront for their service giving us their list of 6 items, once we completed the 6 items on the list he came back round to inspect it, they added more things to the list and then re-inspected our renovation and they kept adding things to the list, they were very hard to deal with and cost us heart ache and grief as we had sold our house and had no felling for our situation and kept adding jobs that would not have usually be an issue according to a former council inspector.

On one area they instated we pull our front portico down and rebuild it, I disagreed with them and I had an engineer come to inspect it (at my extra cost) and said it was built ok but told me it was up to the DG Certifiers discretion to pass it and felt it was unnecessary to re build it, and gave me an alternative to rectify a hard faced discission by DG Certifiers, after I got the engineer to inspect it DG Certifiers refused to inspect it again and became more difficult to deal with.

My advise to everyone do not use DG Certifiers.

• 

  CERTIFIERS Newbie 

  An initial onsite consultation to look over unacceptable built structures (payment for our callout on the day,) Clients given more than 6 items to rectify. Did not hear from clients for at least 4 months after initial consultation. A former council inspector? Legislation, codes change. When approving structures today, it must meet today's standards. Pull the front portico down? No, we asked for sheets to be removed so that the unacceptable built structure, i.e. ridge beams could be sized to ensure that it met today's standards-it is unreasonable to be able to inspect and assess a structure when it is covered over. Clients were given option to use an engineer to re-assess the ridge beams structural adequacy& clients were requested by engineer to provide extra tie-down details. 3 â?? 4 additional inspections@no charge and we were difficult to deal with? Apparently unaware of building requirements. We have repeat business!

  11 months ago

  REPORT
• 

  CERTIFIERS Newbie 

  Keep in mind that these particular clients went ahead and built structures before obtaining a building approval and such structures did not meet the required building standards.

  11 months ago

  REPORT